Indigo Rose Software

Professional Software Development Tools

 
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Corey is offline Indigo Rose Staff Alumni
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    9,746

    An awfully sweet SSL compressor for free (Mac only)

    I know we don't have too many Mac folks here but I thought I would post this for those who do visit, it's an impressive looking VST/AU plug-in for Macs only. A repro of the mic compressor from the famed SSL "E" series consoles. Enjoy:
    http://www.solid-state-logic.com/res...mc1plugin.html

    Read the story of how the E series listen mic compressor contributed to the success of Phil Collin's "In The Air Tonight" here:
    http://mixonline.com/mag/audio_phil_...air/index.html

  2. #2
    Corey is offline Indigo Rose Staff Alumni
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    9,746
    Interesting, Leo LaPorte said on his podcast "The Techguy #181" that he does all his audio editing on PC "because it's faster".

    Plus he recommends iRiver for MP3 players, not iPods. Also interesting, I always had him pegged as pro-Apple.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Southeast USA
    Posts
    1,804
    Also interesting, I always had him pegged as pro-Apple.
    Hee! Leo definitely likes Apple's products, by and large. He has forgotten more about OS X than I'll ever know. Being a fan of the Macintosh operating system does not necessarily force a diametrically opposed viewpoint for Windows, though. I think he's wise to choose the right tool for the job - on a job by job basis. Ask him what computer he'd rather use in most cases for video or photo editing, and I would bet he has a different opinion.
    Eric Darling
    eThree Media
    http://www.ethreemedia.com

  4. #4
    Corey is offline Indigo Rose Staff Alumni
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    9,746
    He was saying something on the same podcast about Photoshop running the same on PC as Mac due to the way the software is designed or something to that effect. He said that Photoshop wasn't taking advantage of the full capability of Mac under certain conditions. I can't recall the entire context of that comment though so I'm probably not grasping what he meant, but it seemed like something to that effect...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Southeast USA
    Posts
    1,804
    Yeah - you'd gawk at the new real-time editing functions in Apple's own iPhoto product (part of the iLife suite), and the new, more beefy, Aperture. I had the most eye-opening experience watching a colleague work on it during a shoot this week. There's nothing else like it yet available for any operating system.

    Live histograms are huge. And the rotation tool is simple and renders beautiful results. Aperture is not a Photoshop killer by any stretch, but it should give Adobe pause. There are some cool things Apple is doing. For one, UI is much more intuitive.

    Seeing is believing!
    Eric Darling
    eThree Media
    http://www.ethreemedia.com

  6. #6
    Corey is offline Indigo Rose Staff Alumni
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    9,746
    The people who actually pay for Photoshop won't bat an eye over Aperture. They're not in the market for image editing software... Photoshop is a very deep product, I can't imagine any first version software being anywhere near as functional.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Southeast USA
    Posts
    1,804
    I'm not predicting a downfall for Photoshop.

    I'm a Photoshop user (since version 3, actually, and I have paid for every version I have owned, thanks). I know I'm a sort of anomaly of sorts when it comes to my computing habits, but I assure you I'm far from the only long-time Photoshop user who will gladly ALSO own Aperture. And I'll pay for that, too.
    Eric Darling
    eThree Media
    http://www.ethreemedia.com

  8. #8
    Corey is offline Indigo Rose Staff Alumni
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    9,746
    I can't picture many people who pay for Photoshop also paying for Aperture personally. Especially businesses and advanced users. Why? There's no image editing you can do in Aperture which you can't do (probably quicker) in Photoshop. The key sales appeal of Aperture is to people who have never seen Photoshop.

    I don't think many people buy both Premiere and Vegas, and I don't think many people buy both Cubase and Cakewalk, so I expect that pattern to hold vis-a-vis Aperture...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Southeast USA
    Posts
    1,804
    Actually, you're right... No one would buy both Premiere and Vegas. Most video production shops would buy Final Cut Pro.

    Call around the various video production companies in your town and ask them what software they use. You might be surprised at how many don't handle production on a Windows box.

    Same goes for pro photographers. And that's why Apple made this software. Not for the masses. Not, alas, for graphic designers. It's right there in their marketing hype. Photographers.
    Eric Darling
    eThree Media
    http://www.ethreemedia.com

  10. #10
    Corey is offline Indigo Rose Staff Alumni
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    9,746
    Well they'll definitely find some consumers no doubt, Apple always does. But I anticipate almost no overlap with Photoshop users, photographers or otherwise...

Similar Threads

  1. Mac autostart function???
    By Protocol in forum AutoPlay Media Studio 4.0
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-26-2003, 10:25 AM
  2. Re: Mac interface...
    By Protocol in forum AutoPlay Media Studio 4.0
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-10-2003, 07:46 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts