|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just thought i would add a note here.
I have been using TU1 for a few years and over that time have refined the process as best i could. Still these updates took time. I would estimate that on over 20 minutes for each update as parameters needed to be changed many times over and re-checked, tested, etc.. I have so far upgraded several project from TU1 to TU2. By making use of just the "Constants" along with the Publish wizard, i have reduced this down to a few minutes, but best of all I don't need all the extra changes/re-checking and also i need less testing on pre-tested update scripts. All in all a fantastic upgrade. I even had one client reply today, asking how i managed to have such a good turn around time. (I have both Setup Factory 7 and True Update 2 being automated; 1 change at 1 location only)
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Great news, thanks for taking the time to let us know! We love hearing success stories.
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TU2 vs TU1 and wininet | Mortamer | TrueUpdate 1.0 | 3 | 05-25-2005 11:16 AM |
| What a difference it made... | Intrigued | General Chat | 5 | 02-09-2004 12:18 AM |
| INFO: Difference between the Media Player Object and the AVI Object | Support | AutoPlay Media Studio 4.0 Examples | 0 | 10-29-2002 03:15 PM |
| INFO: The Difference Between Preview and Build | Support | AutoPlay Menu Studio 3.0 | 0 | 10-29-2002 01:22 PM |
| INFO: The Difference between the "On Close" and "On Destroy" Events | Support | AutoPlay Media Studio 4.0 Examples | 0 | 10-03-2002 03:10 PM |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:59 PM.






Linear Mode

