bcaufield
04-18-2005, 03:45 PM
Our Company needs to keep a suite of applications up-to-date and are evaluating True Update for this purpose. I noticed that there is a multi-executable file update method, which leads me to believe that this may be possible. We also need to satisfy these additional requirements:
1) User's can choose which applications to update, ideally by listing the available apps and letting them check them off the ones they want.
2) The available apps list is based on what the user has already installed and their security level as determined by evaluating the return value from a C-style dll call.
3) The Server restricts the allowed extensions to known types such as ".txt" or ".exe". Unique extensions are not allowed. Filenames are similarly restricted to having predetermined prefixes.
4) The Server directory is determined by the user's security level, since some applications are publicly available while others are restricted. Secure folders also require a login dialog.
5) Ideally the user should also be able to install new tools (rather than updates). This should use a similar interface, with exception of how the available application list is generated.
What do you think? We have written a application that handles the majority of these requirements, but it is several years old and too slow, large and buggy to run on startup in silent mode. It would be great to purchase rather than re-write, since True Update seems like a well thought out solution.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Brian Caufield
1) User's can choose which applications to update, ideally by listing the available apps and letting them check them off the ones they want.
2) The available apps list is based on what the user has already installed and their security level as determined by evaluating the return value from a C-style dll call.
3) The Server restricts the allowed extensions to known types such as ".txt" or ".exe". Unique extensions are not allowed. Filenames are similarly restricted to having predetermined prefixes.
4) The Server directory is determined by the user's security level, since some applications are publicly available while others are restricted. Secure folders also require a login dialog.
5) Ideally the user should also be able to install new tools (rather than updates). This should use a similar interface, with exception of how the available application list is generated.
What do you think? We have written a application that handles the majority of these requirements, but it is several years old and too slow, large and buggy to run on startup in silent mode. It would be great to purchase rather than re-write, since True Update seems like a well thought out solution.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Brian Caufield